CLAN Edinburgh
1  2  |  3  |  4  |  5   |  6  7 | Links     Home

Best Principles: Assessment, Teaching and Learning, Using Technology
Adult education already has seven established principles on which its learning and organisation guidelines are founded. These affect all learners but how are these put into practise when working with students with specific learning difficulties (SpLDs)? At the moment there is no system for screening adults for SpLDs through Adult Education nor is there any systematic awareness training for managers and tutors working with students who are suspected of presenting with a condition of Specific Learning Difficulty.

Assessment of SpLD – A Contentious Issue?
The assessment of SpLds by agencies such as CLAN or CBAL is a contentious issue. It has been said that learners unhappy about being labelled “disabled” could view positive diagnosis negatively or that it might give rise to their having heightened expectations of remediation or even “cure” or “recovery”. When specially trained advisers with guidance and counselling available conduct diagnostic assessment within an Adult Education environment, diagnosis of SpLD is likely to be viewed positively. The focus is not therefore on labelling the learner but “to ensure that the learning that occurs is valued and validated. Locating specific strengths and weaknesses within their context creates new possibilities.” (9)

Another reason for contention is because some managers are reluctant to label learners with a medical /clinical condition, thus giving the impression they accept a medical model of disability rather than the social model upon which inclusive practise in adult education is founded. But the point of assessing and potentially diagnosing learners with SpLD within the context of Adult Education is very different. It is directly in accord with the Learning Programme Guidelines and much of the Organisation Guidelines set out within The Good Practice Framework Literacy and Numeracy. (10)

Assessment and diagnosis are also valued and promoted by key organisations and individuals working with adults with SpLDs in this country and abroad. The British Dyslexia Association, Helen Arkell Dyslexia Centre, The Dyslexia Institute, SPELD NSW, FE/HE institutions, academics such as Gavin Reid (Senior lecturer) and Jane Kirk (both at the Faculty of Education, University of Edinburgh) (11) and the Secretary of State for Education and Employment are just a few of those concerned with promoting good practice in relation to assessment and support for those whose prospects are impaired by SpLDs.

An American paper, written by P. K. Hardman Ph.D. (Dyslexia Research Institute, Tallahassee, Florida) (12) focussed on the successes of properly identifying and providing literacy intervention to adults with SpLD:
“When the systems complain that it is too expensive to provide the necessary one-to-one academic therapy required to properly address this learning difference they should consider the cost to continue addressing it inappropriately. They should consider the return to the taxpayer and to the individual when instruction matches the different learning style of the dyslexic”

Local Authorities now have a duty under the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act (post 16 education) not to discriminate against disabled students. In some cases adjustments are supposed to be made to accommodate the particular needs of individuals so there is a responsibility on educations providers to do what they can to find out what these needs are. If reasonable attempts are made to find out what these needs are then the provider will not be liable for failure to make specific adjustments. (13)

References:
(9) Cooper, R.Dr., Diagnosing Dyslexia, The Case for an Inclusive Learning Approach
www.getting-on.co.uk/toolkit/mp_diagnosing_dyslexia.html
(10) See appendix for copy of The Good Practice Framework Literacy and Numeracy
(11)
www.getting-on.co.uk/toolkit/jkirk.html
(12) Paper by Hardman, P.K. Ph.D. “Removing the Literacy Barriers to Training and Employment for Dyslexic/ADD/SLD/Disabled Adults,” Dyslexia Research Institute, Tallahassee, Florida (1999)
(13) Further reading:
www.skill.org.uk/news/senda.asp


Eight Reasons For Diagnostic Assessment of Learners for SpLDs by Adult Education providers:
• The diagnostic assessment process is empowering and enabling rather than labelling.
• Entitlement to support and resources often rests on proven diagnosis of SpLD
• Diagnostic assessment helps learners understand their SpLD and compensate for their weaknesses by utilising their strengths
• Diagnostic Assessment validates the learner’s strengths and promotes their self esteem
• Diagnostic Assessment helps the learner (and any support worker/tutor who might be working with them) to understand their individual learning style so their learning can be more effective
• Diagnostic Assessment explains past failure. The learner can avoid compounding failure by developing appropriate compensatory strategies.
• There is an economic rational for diagnostic assessment of SpLD
• Diagnostic Assessment is in accord with the responsibility to anticipate disability in learners and make reasonable adjustment detailed in the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act (post 16) May 2001 – effective since September 2002.

next page